Latest SEO Strategies for the Tourism and Travel Industry

High-converting organic search tactics for destination pages, booking engines, and travel marketplaces.

Speakers: Samet Özsüleyman, Emre Dolu

09 Jan 2024

Video Transcript

⏱ 26 min read• 4,599 words

Read the full speech or switch languages

— Hey everyone, welcome to Zeo Talks. Today I'm here with Rasim and Emre to talk SEO. Our main focus: the travel and vacation industry. We'll walk you through our thinking, conversation style. What should you watch for in SEO? What actions should you take? We'll chat about all of it. And we'll pass along any tips that come to mind. Let's skip the long intro. I'll jump straight in with a small question. Actually it's not small. It's a big one. Emre, you know vacation season is coming up. What can we recommend to users in SEO? Or really, to the specialists doing this work? With vacation season approaching, what would you suggest for travel and tourism SEO?

That's the question I want to put to you, in short.

— Hi everyone. As you know, the travel industry is already huge. The volume is massive. Especially before summer hits. There's a winter season too, of course. But in our country, summer brings way more traffic and volume. That's just how the holidays work here. So the work has to start before summer even hits. Winter months, maybe right after the previous summer. Anything you do during summer won't show results right away. Maybe next year. So the first thing that comes to mind: as you know. All travel sites are huge sites.

There are big hotel pages. Tons of hotel pages. Tons of hotel listing pages. First thing I'd do is pull those filter structures out of the internal link architecture. We see them on most brands. That's the first optimization that comes to mind. Because we've seen a lot of filtered links. Listing pages linking to hotel pages. Other pages linking to filtered listing pages. Even on big sites. That inevitably hurts how Google crawls filtered pages. It hurts your crawl budget too. Sure, filter pages are pages the customer and the user need to reach. But serve them so Google can't reach them. Maybe with JavaScript links. That's the ideal way to optimize Google's crawl budget.

That'd probably be the first improvement I'd suggest. I've seen a lot of these sites.

— Yeah, I'm totally with you on that. Let me add a couple things. You already covered the technical side. Here's what I'd do with content, if I worked in this industry. First off, let's say the site is over a year old. We already have last year's Search Console data. We have page performance too. We ranked, for better or worse. I'd take those URLs and queries and compare them against last year's numbers. Then I'd ask: where do I stand on each query? What's my average position? Did my clicks drop? Which landing pages show that drop?

Break that down a little further. Then do everything you can to hold or improve the traffic you already have. After that, the actions you mentioned get the site into much better shape. Those were the first things on my mind too. I figure we'll deep dive into all of this later in the chat. There's another piece too. You know, global markets, inflation, the economy, geopolitics. From the Russia-Ukraine war to what's happening in Palestine. Or the economic problems I just mentioned. These shift what users need, especially in Turkey. People pick cheaper locations. So what do we do? By default, when we run these analyses, we push more traffic to the high-volume pages.

Okay, these are high priority and high volume. But conversion rates might climb. That depends on analysis that doesn't ignore these economic conditions. Which pages are users landing on? Which hotel pages? If the site has data on that, look at it. Honestly, for the first phase, I'd tie all of this to global markets. And to geopolitical position.

— I think we can open another topic here. You know prices in the hotel sector have climbed hard lately. And as you know, when we have hotel clients. We hear it back from them sometimes. People are skipping the domestic hotel vacation. I'm speaking for our generation especially. They book a tour abroad instead. Or they stay at hotels overseas. Maybe the hotel itself is worse. But the point is to travel. So hotels abroad matter. Tours abroad matter. Taking action abroad matters a lot. Not just domestic. Action outside the country has already become pretty important.

And it looks like it's getting even more important. When we look at most sites abroad, for example. Not just the brand we manage, but competitors too. We see that overseas pages are kind of falling behind. Let me not say falling behind. They're just not getting much attention. The overseas pages shouldn't pile up debt there either. The work over there can't slip. Abroad you've got tons of locations. Tons of hotel pages. That puts a lot of extra load on the site. Optimizing those duplicate pages matters. So does thinking through how to optimize crawl budget there. I think that becomes a big topic.

— Absolutely. You can even check Google Hotel Center for insights. And like you said, let's take Thailand as an example. Say there's a location page for Bangkok. You've built a page for it on your site. But let's say there are only one or two hotels. And that one hotel sits way above the competitors on price. At that point you're basically saying, okay, I have a page. I'm listed with hotels here. I'm showing hotels. So Google should rank me. Okay, but you need to look at the other factors too. That's why those matter, just like you said. I can even hand off from there. You already know this. Expedia published a report.

We analyzed it together. There were a few different topics in it. I wanted to walk viewers through some of that. There's set shedding. What was set shedding? Let me give a quick tip on it. Or really, a quick explanation. This actually ties into TV shows, folks. Say you're watching a series or a movie. Where was it filmed? If it's a historical film or show shot in Romania. Those Romanian locations can blow up. Or if it was shot in Bulgaria, those Bulgarian spots get hot. We don't always catch this in Turkish queries. But in foreign-language queries, the trend growth is serious.

The report expects big growth here in 2024. My advice: analyze these trends. Then build landing pages around them. And on those pages, actually give users the data they came for. Don't just say "Samet said so in that video." Sure. Build a page around a show's name. But do the work that makes users happy. If users aren't happy, Google won't treat your site well either. Do you see it differently, or?

— I mean, we always say build the page around user experience. Like you said, an empty page just doesn't cut it. Optimizing it, doing the whole job, that matters. Maybe we can tie this to something. It's a great topic. Let me give you an example. Not a TV show this time, obviously. You know the Greece visa thing this summer. Actually not summer, starting in May. Visa on arrival. The moment that news broke, news sites jumped on it. But travel and hotel sites need to work that trend in fast.

The second that news drops, maybe we publish a blog post. Or if we're a hotel site, we spin up a listing page. Something like "Greece hotels, visa on arrival." List the hotels on those islands right there. Back it with some content. Then promote it. Run ads on it. Not just in SEO'da, of course. Announce it on social too. Stuff like that. I think those moves matter a lot. Because there's solid instant traffic there, you know. And starting in May the volume gets way bigger.

— Absolutely. Like you said, you look at those islands. You check the island names. Some of them even have Turkish names. Those can go into the content too. If they want to prioritize, they can look at search volume. Or check how conversions look. Then prioritize off that. Same goes for users who want to open these pages. Or our viewers, I should say. Quick plug while we're here. We've got videos on this coming out on YouTube. You can also listen to us on Spotify.

Our podcasts live there too. Some of that isn't in the video versions. Another thing that report pointed to, Emre, was alternative locations. It says economic conditions are one of the biggest reasons users head to alternative spots. So instead of Bangkok, for example, users are going to Pattaya. The report notes people are searching all kinds of alternative locations. So if you run a website in this space, check your location pages. Are you actually ranking well for those alternative spots? Worth a look.

Or you could optimize the content pages. That's my take.

— Yeah.

— Let's move to another topic. I think it's time to deep dive into SEO a bit more. I'll actually open with EAT. Our viewers already know EAT. From health sites to every other site, it matters hugely in travel too. Because it's a topic that touches people's money. You pay months in advance. You want the best experience once you're there. So you have to be strong on EAT. I won't go too deep into the details. But think about the things that could be quick wins.

For example, I try to read Google's new blog articles too. There's a topic there about showing experience. Everyone can grab that photo from Shutterstock or somewhere else, related to the trip. But did you actually take that trip yourself and shoot the photo? Or what kind of experience did you have? You can show that experience. From ticket prices to other details. My suggestion for sites in this sector on EAT would be this. Take backpackers, for example. Say I'm going on a trip alone. When you travel solo, which hotels or locations work for one person? If sites take action on genuinely niche topics like this. I think they'd improve on experience for EAT. And on the other metrics too.

— Absolutely. You hit on a really good point. Let me add something small here. As you know, we're already writing this content. Say we're writing someone's travel guide. A travel guide for a specific location. It matters a lot that the person writing it actually experienced it. Writing it by looking things up is one thing. Experiencing it is another. There's a huge gap between the two. And the person who lived it should write from that experience. That's exactly what you and I recommend to our brands and clients.

So if you're producing that piece, let's say it's about Mersin. You're doing a Mersin travel guide. You spent two days exploring Mersin. You took the photos. Now you're going to write it up. Maybe you'll make video content too. That's where tiny details can hook the reader. Say I'm the one reading a Mersin travel guide. I want to visit Mersin. But I don't know where to start. I don't know which starting point makes the trip better. Every piece of content just says the same thing. Here are 40 places to see in Mersin. But nobody tells me the real thing. Start here. Then move on to this spot. Then head over there. If someone walked me through it properly, that would actually help me.

Instead of reading 40 different things. That's what we try to recommend to our brands too. Like a two-day Mersin trip plan. Have breakfast here. Then head over there. Catch a bus nearby to this next spot. From there you can move on. That format grabs the user way better, I think.

— Absolutely. I even publish stuff like that on my own blog when I find time. Say I'm writing about Thailand. I really try to convey the experience properly. IPhone prices in Thailand. Where to stay. Where to stay in Bangkok. Budget-friendly hotels. Family-friendly spots. More central locations. I share my own experiences on all of it. I'm trying to make the user happy right there. Otherwise I know the drill. Write 500 words, write 1000 words. Try to rank for that keyword. But that's not the point. The more effort you put in. The more you get back at the end of the day. Of course, not every good article is going to rank well.

You already mentioned technical errors in your intro. So looking at all of it in detail, overall. Is the better approach in my opinion.

— Yeah.

— Next topic: content freshness. I touched on this a bit in the comparison part, with the YOY data. But I think content updates deserve more attention. What's your take on this? Especially with early booking season and all those cycles running right now.

— Yes, absolutely. Both the content itself and the listing pages. Freshness matters a lot there. The moment we hit 2024, at the end of 2023. We're already pushing to swap 2023 titles over to 2024.

— Let me jump in here. Emre and I run into this constantly. Look at the CTRs and you see pages taking a serious hit. Whole sites, even. They left it at 2023 and never changed it. Organic positions can get really bad. So if you're watching this video right now, go change those. If you haven't already.

— Absolutely. And we see it a lot in blog content. A brand wrote about passport fees back in 2022. Or visa fees. Or the appointment fee for something. It's stuck in 2022. Then they forget it, maybe never update it. And the user lands there and gets completely wrong info. That definitely hurts you. So we need to keep our content fresh. Every piece with a price in it needs updating at intervals. This stuff changes constantly. That matters a lot.

— Absolutely. For some brands we actually build a content update table. This page gets updated every 3 months, that one every 6. We said update the title, but there's the body too. Passport fees, or whatever service you offer. Those change too. It's not just about updating meta tag info. Say you're trying to rank for "hotels in Nicosia." You've got content on that listing page. But the body still says entry costs 50 lira. So your content is out of date, plain and simple. Until you act on things like this, strong performance is hard.

— Absolutely. Let's go a bit deeper on how you catch it. Words with currency in them: TL, lira, that kind of thing. You can find them easily in Google Search. Or use the search feature while crawling in Screaming Frog.

— Absolutely.

— Maybe you can see it.

— Absolutely. Let me ask you this. What kind of content strategy should sites in this sector run right now? What should they watch out for? Blog structure, listing pages, all of it. What's your take?

— On content, we already touched on the blog experience side. Let me flag one of the big problems I keep hitting. It's about listing pages. Sometimes there's no hotel on a listing page, as you know. A city's hotel page can run out of hotels. Or the brand's contract ends. The listing page sits completely empty. But underneath it we might have 700-800 words of content. So we did put the effort in there. A user searches for hotels, lands on our site, and gets zero experience. No hotels at all.

I've seen that most travel brands don't do this. If there's no listing, they don't redirect the customer at all. Like, hey, we don't have a hotel here. But check out our listing page in the nearest location. We do have a hotel there. Go there instead. The locations are really close anyway. Or take a look at these hotels. These are close too. They just don't say "this might work for you." I think that's a gap. You should definitely point people to nearby locations. Even if they land on an empty page, send them somewhere.

And we should never close that empty page. I'm not even getting into that. You keep it for the hotel you'll add later. That kind of redirect moves users to other pages. And that opens up a path to a sale. That's one of the biggest problems that comes to mind first.

— Yeah. Maybe you could build video content too. That feeds users right there on the page. You can fold that into the content strategy. And like I said at the very start, I'll say it again. You need to keep the content as fresh as possible. Instead of writing it and walking away, call it periodic maintenance. All of this needs to get done. Let's move into more technical stuff. Structured data, schemas. If you haven't seen it yet. I have a meetup on Zeo's YouTube channel just about structured data.

Let me squeeze in a quick plug here. You can watch that one too. I think it was back in December. Google had already published a vacation rental schema type. It was signaling that things were about to change in this space. And just a few weeks ago they shipped another update around variant schema. So what would you recommend to our viewers on the schema side?

— With our latest client, as you know, we had a long talk about flight schema. Flight schema there, or hotel schema, for example. Usually clients and brands give very little info in the schema. They don't get lazy exactly, they just dodge it. Because...

— Or it doesn't throw an error. No errors at all. The structured data test tool says fine, no errors. No warnings either. Okay. But you need to look at other things too.

— Yeah. Passing every bit of data we can inside the schema code matters a lot. It separates you from competitors. It also gives Google better information. Let me use flight schema as an example. Most sites I check have flight schema. But they only pass six hundred variables and move on. With clients, we push to fill all twenty variables. Of course, some clients can't pull certain fields. The plane, the flight time, the departure time. The airport codes, everything. We try to pass it all.

They can't always provide everything. But we still make the recommendation. If they can provide it, that's a bonus.

— Absolutely. And there's one more thing to watch there. So you wrote the schema code. You even said, Samet, we wrote it in more detail. You built it out. That's great. I hope you do it. Once you do, here's what matters. The tools, the test tools, only check it technically. Whether it's wrong or not. Say you put info in the name field that shouldn't be there. Or in the price field. Those can cause really serious problems. That's why it helps to check random pages manually with an extra set of eyes.

— Absolutely. Let me add one small thing here. It's not directly about schema. But we already give price info in the schema. For hotels, for flights. And Google actually said this in one of its own docs. On flight pages, don't put the flight price in the title. It doesn't say "absolutely never," but that's the guidance. It says "I won't show it." We see that with brands sometimes. The title has price info. Like "starting from this much." But as Google says in its own doc. It won't actually show that. The reason is that flight prices change by the minute. They don't want to mislead the user.

Because it changes constantly. Google can't crawl that fast. So the title stays wrong. The user clicks in and the price is maybe 50-100 TL higher. That's why Google recommends it that way.

— Google usually doesn't give us clear info on this stuff. You know it updates the documentation. But it just says "don't do this. Don't do that." It rarely gives specifics like this. And from a pure user's point of view. The title says something like "prices starting from 10 euros abroad.". Nope, there's no ticket for 10 euros when you land on that page. So like you said, these carry a real risk of losing users for websites. In this industry again, one of the hardest parts with you. Or really one of the biggest workload drivers for us. Is filtered URLs and crawl budget.

What would you want to say here? Any tips for the viewers?

— We touched on it briefly in the intro. Like I said, these filter pages apply to e-commerce too. Same goes for hotel pages. And I think you absolutely should have filter pages. Because they're really important pages for the user. But not for us. Not for SEO, unfortunately. So we could build those filter pages with JavaScript instead of Ahrefs. That way Google may not reach those links in the first place. On top of that, we can optimize internal linking. Think breadcrumbs. Think the links pointing to hotels on listing pages. In those spots we use our clean URL structures instead of filtered ones. That pushes the pages we care about forward.

On the other side, like I said, building filter pages this way helps. And maybe blocking them from crawling in robots.txt too. Those would be the extra changes we already know about. That's what comes to mind.

— Yeah, absolutely. Maybe I can add something here. Like you said, you have to manage the filters. But I think there's another analysis worth doing. You have a filter structure. On listing pages, hotel listings, or your other page types. But also look at competitors. Or check some benchmarks abroad. See what filter pages they have. They might be offering a much richer filter structure. You can pull all that with tools like Screaming Frog. Just look at those paths. That's doable. We say clean up your filter pages. Optimize them. But some page types really do create valuable new URLs through filters. Take "five-star Bodrum hotels," for example. Search volume there is high. So maybe they should think about opening those up.

So on topics like this, weigh it carefully. Then take action based on that. It might make a lot more sense. Especially for managing crawl budget.

— Yeah. Maybe we can connect this to something else. Speaking of crawl budget. You mentioned five-star Bodrum hotels. Let's tie that to internal linking strategy. Here's what we see on most sites. Say I land on a single hotel page. Say I'm just making this up. Sapanca hotels, right now. But when I land on the Sapanca hotels page, the site doesn't route me anywhere. What am I actually looking for in Sapanca hotels? What's in Sapanca? If there's a thermal hotel, maybe I'd check that. If there's a bungalow, maybe I'd look at that.

I'm making this up just as an example. Routing people out of these pages really matters. Send the user off with internal links, maybe up top in a banner. Maybe with small thumbnails next to each link. That helps both the internal linking and the user's path. Same thing with what you said. Five-star Bodrum hotels, for example. A user on the Bodrum hotels page can maybe get there through filters. They click a filter and land on some parameter URL. But we want them to hit it as a direct link.

No parameters. Put it in the banner again. Five-star Bodrum hotels. Boutique hotels in Bodrum. Drop those links right there. That builds a solid internal linking strategy too.

— Absolutely. We hit so many different cases that things pop into my head while you talk. We even talked about this on Discord this morning. The time to first byte thing. It's a bit of a jump from the internet topic over to time to first byte. But I just want to share one trick there. Sometimes internal links throw a 500 instead of a 404. The URL is broken, so it should return 404. But technical issues make it return 500 instead. That inflates the server error count in your time to first byte data. And that metric can spike hard.

So for these really niche cases, you have to dig deep and actually analyze. Coming back to internal links. You already shared a lot of great info. But here's what I see. You need to build a solid anchor text strategy. Long tail queries work here. So do other query types. Put them in your anchor texts the right way. That points Googlebot to the relevant pages. And it signals what the page is about ahead of time.

— Absolutely. I think the same way.

— Exactly. Let me check my other notes real quick. We already covered the international side. You summed that up in the intro. So that's covered. Nothing else comes to mind. Emre, anything you want to add?

— Small one. Your 500 mention reminded me. 404s and 500s. As you know, when a hotel contract ends, most sites just close that hotel's page. They close it and don't redirect. The hotel page drops straight to a 404. And all that authority gets lost. It might be worth building a real plan here. Especially on that hotel detail page. If it's a big hotel brand, it can pull a lot of backlinks. Those backlinks get thrown away too. So when our deal with the hotel ends. And they haven't asked us to take the page down. My first choice would be keeping it live. That's my take on the 404 issue.

Second choice is a redirect, sure. But keeping it open and distributing that traffic well is also an option. We're not selling that hotel anymore. Still, when a user lands there, maybe another branch is bookable. You can send them there. Or to similar hotels close by. I'm talking about that same page. That way we don't lose the traffic. And we route it somewhere that's closer to a sale.

— Absolutely. Oh, I forgot to mention trends. You know 2024 is packed with sports events. The Euros are happening, for example. You have to work those trends. Search volume for locations in the host country will climb too. I think you should spot these early and act. One more thing hit me while you were talking. I forgot to mention it. We already covered alternative locations. But in 2024 you also get concerts alongside sports events. Big-name artists sell a ton of tickets. Once people buy those tickets, they travel. Flights, hotels, tour packages. I'd look at a list of these too. If the brand has the capacity to serve them, build pages for them. Build content for them.

But here's the critical part. Don't build it just because we said so. Only launch these pages if you can genuinely add value for users. The payoff can look very different otherwise. I wanted to add that at the end.

— Absolutely.

— Okay then. That wraps our Zeo Talks on travel and tourism with Emre. Zeo also publishes travel reports on this sector. Don't forget to check them out. You can find them on our social media accounts too. See you at the next Zeo Talks. Take care of yourselves. Bye for now.

— See you soon. Take care.

This transcript was generated using AI speech recognition and verified against subtitle style rules.

Yiğit Konur

Content author

Yiğit Konur

both

Contact us

How we handle your data

Open as a full page