AI Consulting Services
Build AI capability around the work people actually do

Some of the 500+ brands we've worked with. Our delivery runs on 100+ AI workflows in production.
See all referencesTask-level offerings
Match the training to the job people actually do
Adopt & Scale


AI AdoptionStrategy
Adoption strategy fits when workforce enablement needs audience segments, manager and champion actions, barrier ownership, and meaningful-use measures before rollout.


AI WorkflowRedesign Workshop
Run the redesign workshop when practitioners and process owners must map real workarounds, compare AI with simpler options, and rank bounded experiments.


Executive AILiteracy
Bring leaders here when portfolio, governance, risk, and investment choices are already on their agenda and the group lacks grounding to challenge claims.


Role-Based WorkforceAI Training
One AI tool, several jobs. This path gives analysts, support leads, marketers, and developers separate task practice, data boundaries, and competence rubrics.


Responsible & SecureAI Training
Responsible and secure training fits when policy knowledge must become practiced judgment on data, IP, harmful output, prompt injection, verification, and escalation.


AI Productivity &Workflow Training
Pick this when a team already reports faster work and the open question is whether accepted quality, defects, and rework held on representative tasks.


Hands-On PromptEngineering Workshop
Choose the lab when people already use approved tools daily and the remaining gap is knowing which prompt change fixes an observed defect.


AI Champions & Centerof Excellence Enablement
Enable champions when adoption support already depends on informal helpers who lack protected capacity, a clear mandate, coaching cadence, and escalation routes.


AI Adoption Measurement& Optimization
Adoption measurement fits when tool activity cannot show whether selected workflows improved, which cohorts struggle, or what barrier-linked action an owner should prioritize.
Why it matters
Tool access is the beginning of the work
People need approved workflows, practice that resembles the job, clear data boundaries, manager support, and somewhere to take difficult questions. Attendance and license counts still add context. By themselves, they don't show that the work improved.
How we work
Start with the role and the work in front of it
We choose the work each audience needs to perform, then design practice around the right tools and policies. Participants show what they can do. Managers, champions, and support channels carry the practice beyond the session.
Scope and ownership
Attendance is context; what people can demonstrate is the evidence
The program is designed around the roles, workflows, and decisions in front of each audience, not around a curriculum.
We identify the roles, workflows, approved tools, policy boundaries, current behaviour, barriers, and support gaps that should shape the program, then turn representative work into role-relevant curricula, workshops, job aids, manager actions, champion support, and clear escalation routes. Participants work through representative tasks, verify outputs, handle difficult scenarios, and demonstrate the skill or judgment the program is meant to develop. Managers, champions, and support channels carry the practice beyond the session and stay yours to run; the review reads meaningful use, competence, barriers, and support signals, and says plainly that licence and attendance counts add context without showing that the work changed.
How we build AI adoption into everyday work
Understand the audiences and the work
We identify the roles, workflows, approved tools, policy boundaries, current behavior, barriers, and support gaps that need to shape the program.
Design practice people can use
Representative work becomes role-relevant curricula, workshops, job aids, manager actions, champion support, and clear escalation routes.
Practice, verify, and assess
Participants work through representative tasks, verify outputs, handle difficult scenarios, and demonstrate the skills or judgment the program is meant to develop.
Review what changed
We examine meaningful use, competence, barriers, support signals, and evidence from the tasks so program owners can adjust training and adoption support.
Inside our own team
Five Zeo consultants on what AI is changing in their work
Every operational consultant at Zeo has secure LLM access and training, and AI sits inside the daily work. Five of them came through our AI Bootcamp and wrote down what they expect it to change.
Selected AI sessions
Talks from Digitalzone
Three speakers look at the pace of AI change and what it means for e-commerce and content teams.
People who ship the AI systems they advise on
Agents, chatbots, and RAG systems at Zeo are built by senior engineers who keep operating them after launch. The consultants below are those builders, matched to the work this page covers.

Yiğit Konur
Founder & Chief Strategy Officer

Can Mutioğlu
Senior SEO Executive

Ozan Ketenci
VP of Consulting & Strategy

Didem Himmetli
Marketing Executive

Samet Özsüleyman
SEO Manager

Aybüke Göktuna
Senior SEO Analyst

Elif Naz Akan Karakoç
Senior SEO Executive
Content we've produced on this topic
Tools we use
The AI engineering stack behind the work
Models, retrieval, evaluation and observability are separate layers of a working system. These are the ones we build and operate on.
Models and cloud platforms
- AnthropicClaude anchors the whole program because the training is about capability on real work: it is the model participants practice on, leaders interrogate, champions support, and adoption measurement traces, rather than a simplified training-only environment.
- OpenAIExecutive AI Literacy, Role-Based Workforce AI Training, and Hands-On Prompt Engineering Workshop include OpenAI alongside Claude so the program teaches transferable judgment and workflow patterns rather than memorizing one provider's interface.
- Google GeminiAI Champions & Center of Excellence Enablement includes Gemini when the organization's real adoption surface is Google Workspace, so champions practice the support questions and workflow patterns they will actually encounter after the program.
- Microsoft Azure AIExecutive AI Literacy and Role-Based Workforce AI Training use Azure AI when the client's approved AI environment is Microsoft-native, keeping the exercises inside the same identity, data, and tool boundary employees will face in real work.
- Mistral AIExecutive AI Literacy includes Mistral so leaders see that platform strategy can include European residency and deployable open models, not only the default hosted API choices their teams encounter most often.
- NotionAI Adoption Strategy and AI Workflow Redesign Workshop both end in owned actions, not workshop notes, and Notion is where those segment-specific plans and experiment backlogs stay open for managers and champions to run afterward.
- AirtableAI Adoption Strategy logs each audience segment, barrier, and assigned action in Airtable, which is what lets the broader page's program prove it planned adoption around the roles and workflows that actually differ, instead of copying one generic action across every team.
- GrammarlyAI Productivity & Workflow Training uses Grammarly as a second quality signal on written-output exercises, because this page's own standard is that speed alone does not show the work improved if the result no longer holds up.
- MiroAI Workflow Redesign Workshop maps the current workflow live on a Miro board, workarounds, exceptions, and ownership included, so the program's redesign starts from what people actually do rather than the official process someone remembers afterward.
Agent and automation frameworks
- n8nAI Champions & Center of Excellence Enablement and Role-Based Workforce AI Training use n8n when the learning objective is redesigning a workflow around AI rather than writing a better one-off prompt, keeping the practice tied to the page's own 'work people actually do' framing.
Application and prompt tooling
- PromptLayerHands-On Prompt Engineering Workshop uses PromptLayer to compare each participant's successive prompt versions against the same task, while AI Adoption Measurement & Optimization uses the same history to see whether improved practice is persisting beyond the workshop.
Evaluation and observability
- BraintrustHands-On Prompt Engineering Workshop uses Braintrust to keep each prompt revision on the same task and scoring set, which is what makes an improvement claim comparable rather than the result of switching to an easier example.
- LangfuseAI Adoption Measurement & Optimization uses Langfuse when the deployed workflow is instrumented, checking how participants actually use the AI after training rather than accepting attendance, access, or self-reported confidence as proof the work changed.
- HeliconeAI Adoption Measurement & Optimization uses Helicone to see whether trained workflows keep getting used and at what cost, adding an operating signal the program can't get from attendance or a one-time skills assessment.
- DatadogAI Champions & Center of Excellence Enablement uses Datadog when champions support a deployed workflow, so the program has a real alert and incident signal for where help is needed instead of relying on whoever complains loudest.
Training, serving and MLOps
- Hugging FaceExecutive AI Literacy and Role-Based Workforce AI Training use Hugging Face's model and dataset cards as primary material for practicing a core judgment skill: checking what evidence a model's own documentation actually supports before relying on it.
Safety and security testing
- Lakera GuardResponsible & Secure AI Training uses Lakera Guard to let participants see how a real runtime control reacts to unsafe or manipulated input, connecting the policy judgment taught in the room to an actual production enforcement layer.
- MindgardResponsible & Secure AI Training uses Mindgard's attack scenarios to move past easy, obvious misuse examples and test whether participants can recognize a real adversarial pattern and follow the correct escalation path.
- Guardrails AIResponsible & Secure AI Training uses Guardrails AI to show the difference between a policy statement and a control that runs: participants test inputs that should pass and fail, then inspect the decision rather than hearing only a rule.
Data, labeling and development
- JupyterFive children use Jupyter because this page explicitly refuses to count attendance or access as proof of changed work: adoption, productivity, champions, prompting, and role-based training all need a baseline and measured result a second reviewer can rerun.
Next step
Deploy generative AI solutions with clear business value


FAQ




























