We plan adoption around the roles, workflows, and decisions that matter to your teams. That can mean redesigning work, practicing with approved tools, building safe-use judgment, or giving managers and champions a clearer support role. We then review what people can demonstrate and where the program still needs help. Attendance and tool access add context. On their own, they do not show that the work changed.

Some of the 500+ brands we've worked with. Our delivery runs on 100+ AI workflows in production.

See all references
  • Red Bull
  • Güven Hastanesi
  • eOfis
  • Aksigorta
  • Jack Martin Menswear
  • Lezzet
9 paths cover adoption strategy, workshop redesign, executive literacy, role-based practice, safe-use judgment, productivity habits, prompt skills, champion networks, and adoption measurement.

Adopt & Scale

AI AdoptionStrategy

Tool access is the easy part. The harder work is deciding which workflows should change, what managers and champions will do, and how the adoption owner will review progress. We turn those decisions into a plan built around each audience's barriers.

Adoption strategy fits when workforce enablement needs audience segments, manager and champion actions, barrier ownership, and meaningful-use measures before rollout.

AI WorkflowRedesign Workshop

The people who do one workflow and the people accountable for it map the version that really runs, including workarounds, delays, and exceptions. Together they test whether AI belongs in each task, set human authority, and choose a short list of experiments.

Run the redesign workshop when practitioners and process owners must map real workarounds, compare AI with simpler options, and rank bounded experiments.

Executive AILiteracy

Leaders don't need a model-building class. They need enough technical grounding to challenge claims and work through portfolio, risk, governance, operating-model, and investment choices already on the agenda. The session follows those decisions and records who takes each question forward.

Bring leaders here when portfolio, governance, risk, and investment choices are already on their agenda and the group lacks grounding to challenge claims.

Role-Based WorkforceAI Training

An analyst, support lead, marketer, and developer may share one AI tool, but they don't share the same job or failure points. We give each audience practice built around its tasks, approved tools, data boundaries, and decisions, then hand reinforcement to managers and champions.

One AI tool, several jobs. This path gives analysts, support leads, marketers, and developers separate task practice, data boundaries, and competence rubrics.

Responsible & SecureAI Training

Policies become useful when an employee can apply them to a difficult call. Participants work through role-specific cases involving data, intellectual property, bias, harmful output, prompt injection, verification, and escalation, then explain what they would do and why.

Responsible and secure training fits when policy knowledge must become practiced judgment on data, IP, harmful output, prompt injection, verification, and escalation.

AI Productivity &Workflow Training

A task can feel faster while defects and rework quietly rise. We start with representative work and its accepted quality bar, then let participants practice approved workflows, verification, and peer review. Time only counts as a gain when the whole result holds up.

Pick this when a team already reports faster work and the open question is whether accepted quality, defects, and rework held on representative tasks.

Hands-On PromptEngineering Workshop

Participants bring work they know and the criteria its output must meet. In the lab they break down the task, compare prompt choices on representative and difficult cases, verify defects, and record the patterns that deserve another test.

Choose the lab when people already use approved tools daily and the remaining gap is knowing which prompt change fixes an observed defect.

AI Champions & Centerof Excellence Enablement

Champions may already be answering questions between their regular duties. When requests grow, unclear authority and unprotected time become the operating problem. We define the mandate, capacity, coaching rhythm, reusable assets, escalation routes, and contribution review.

Enable champions when adoption support already depends on informal helpers who lack protected capacity, a clear mandate, coaching cadence, and escalation routes.

AI Adoption Measurement& Optimization

A dashboard may show that people opened a tool. It doesn't show whether accepted work changed, where support failed, or what caused the result. We define meaningful adoption for selected workflows, connect the permitted evidence, and leave causal limits visible in the backlog.

Adoption measurement fits when tool activity cannot show whether selected workflows improved, which cohorts struggle, or what barrier-linked action an owner should prioritize.

People need approved workflows, practice that resembles the job, clear data boundaries, manager support, and somewhere to take difficult questions. Attendance and license counts still add context. By themselves, they don't show that the work improved.

We choose the work each audience needs to perform, then design practice around the right tools and policies. Participants show what they can do. Managers, champions, and support channels carry the practice beyond the session.

The program is designed around the roles, workflows, and decisions in front of each audience, not around a curriculum.

We identify the roles, workflows, approved tools, policy boundaries, current behaviour, barriers, and support gaps that should shape the program, then turn representative work into role-relevant curricula, workshops, job aids, manager actions, champion support, and clear escalation routes. Participants work through representative tasks, verify outputs, handle difficult scenarios, and demonstrate the skill or judgment the program is meant to develop. Managers, champions, and support channels carry the practice beyond the session and stay yours to run; the review reads meaningful use, competence, barriers, and support signals, and says plainly that licence and attendance counts add context without showing that the work changed.

The program starts with the job, then adds practice, support, assessment, and review.
  1. Understand the audiences and the work

    We identify the roles, workflows, approved tools, policy boundaries, current behavior, barriers, and support gaps that need to shape the program.
  2. Design practice people can use

    Representative work becomes role-relevant curricula, workshops, job aids, manager actions, champion support, and clear escalation routes.
  3. Practice, verify, and assess

    Participants work through representative tasks, verify outputs, handle difficult scenarios, and demonstrate the skills or judgment the program is meant to develop.
  4. Review what changed

    We examine meaningful use, competence, barriers, support signals, and evidence from the tasks so program owners can adjust training and adoption support.

Every operational consultant at Zeo has secure LLM access and training, and AI sits inside the daily work. Five of them came through our AI Bootcamp and wrote down what they expect it to change.

Ozan Ketenci
zeo-logo-yuvarlak.png

I see generative AI having an enormous effect on daily life and on every industry it touches. As the technology develops, the range of uses will keep widening across creativity, problem-solving, and innovation. We can already see that range in realistic image, video, and music production, pharmaceutical research, and design. I expect the effect on industries to become profound. E-commerce, healthcare, finance, and many other sectors will be able to create more engaging, personalized experiences and make their processes more efficient.

The ability to produce unique content and solutions will open new possibilities and increase efficiency.

Ozan Ketenci

Samet Özsüleyman
zeo-logo-yuvarlak.png

Generative AI has the potential to transform SEO, digital marketing, and many other sectors. I expect it to play an important role in our lives in the near future, with more personal experiences, more effective marketing, faster interpretation of data, and quicker action. Products and services will improve. Processes such as customer communication will become more efficient, and organizations that fail to keep up will fall behind businesses that bring AI into their work.

Organizations should start planning the AI applications that make sense for their sector now.

Samet Özsüleyman

Hande Parmaksız
zeo-logo-yuvarlak.png

We may be at a moment as significant as the computer revolution, with the potential to transform businesses and industries. Yet for many people, generative AI still means opening a tool such as ChatGPT for a task at work or in daily life. That is only the surface. Companies that integrate generative AI models into workflows and customer processes, and go beyond content production, will gain huge competitive advantages in the coming years.

I believe generative AI should be on the agenda of every board of directors as soon as possible.

Hande Parmaksız

Can Mutioğlu
zeo-logo-yuvarlak.png

I see artificial intelligence as the most exciting technology of both the present and the future. Its potential is unlimited, and we're still at the tip of the iceberg. AI is developing quickly, while much of what it could mean for different sectors remains unexplored. The effect on digital work is already substantial. In the years ahead, I expect breakthroughs that change how entire industries work.

AI's potential will keep expanding. No sector can afford to ignore the opportunity for efficiency and progress. We will keep discovering new dimensions, and I don't see a saturation point.

Can Mutioğlu

Ezgi Gülsen Yaylı
zeo-logo-yuvarlak.png

Work by major technology companies is likely to give generative AI a much wider role in the years ahead. It will create new dynamics in art and design, as well as in sensitive fields such as healthcare and finance. As the technology becomes part of daily life, the ethical and risk questions will grow with it. Being able to follow and experience those developments up close is what makes generative AI so exciting to me.

I look forward to seeing more uses of generative AI that benefit society.

Ezgi Gülsen Yaylı

Three speakers look at the pace of AI change and what it means for e-commerce and content teams.

Models, retrieval, evaluation and observability are separate layers of a working system. These are the ones we build and operate on.

Models and cloud platforms

  • AnthropicClaude anchors the whole program because the training is about capability on real work: it is the model participants practice on, leaders interrogate, champions support, and adoption measurement traces, rather than a simplified training-only environment.
  • OpenAIExecutive AI Literacy, Role-Based Workforce AI Training, and Hands-On Prompt Engineering Workshop include OpenAI alongside Claude so the program teaches transferable judgment and workflow patterns rather than memorizing one provider's interface.
  • Google GeminiAI Champions & Center of Excellence Enablement includes Gemini when the organization's real adoption surface is Google Workspace, so champions practice the support questions and workflow patterns they will actually encounter after the program.
  • Microsoft Azure AIExecutive AI Literacy and Role-Based Workforce AI Training use Azure AI when the client's approved AI environment is Microsoft-native, keeping the exercises inside the same identity, data, and tool boundary employees will face in real work.
  • Mistral AIExecutive AI Literacy includes Mistral so leaders see that platform strategy can include European residency and deployable open models, not only the default hosted API choices their teams encounter most often.
  • NotionAI Adoption Strategy and AI Workflow Redesign Workshop both end in owned actions, not workshop notes, and Notion is where those segment-specific plans and experiment backlogs stay open for managers and champions to run afterward.
  • AirtableAI Adoption Strategy logs each audience segment, barrier, and assigned action in Airtable, which is what lets the broader page's program prove it planned adoption around the roles and workflows that actually differ, instead of copying one generic action across every team.
  • GrammarlyAI Productivity & Workflow Training uses Grammarly as a second quality signal on written-output exercises, because this page's own standard is that speed alone does not show the work improved if the result no longer holds up.
  • MiroAI Workflow Redesign Workshop maps the current workflow live on a Miro board, workarounds, exceptions, and ownership included, so the program's redesign starts from what people actually do rather than the official process someone remembers afterward.

Agent and automation frameworks

  • n8nAI Champions & Center of Excellence Enablement and Role-Based Workforce AI Training use n8n when the learning objective is redesigning a workflow around AI rather than writing a better one-off prompt, keeping the practice tied to the page's own 'work people actually do' framing.

Application and prompt tooling

  • PromptLayerHands-On Prompt Engineering Workshop uses PromptLayer to compare each participant's successive prompt versions against the same task, while AI Adoption Measurement & Optimization uses the same history to see whether improved practice is persisting beyond the workshop.

Evaluation and observability

  • BraintrustHands-On Prompt Engineering Workshop uses Braintrust to keep each prompt revision on the same task and scoring set, which is what makes an improvement claim comparable rather than the result of switching to an easier example.
  • LangfuseAI Adoption Measurement & Optimization uses Langfuse when the deployed workflow is instrumented, checking how participants actually use the AI after training rather than accepting attendance, access, or self-reported confidence as proof the work changed.
  • HeliconeAI Adoption Measurement & Optimization uses Helicone to see whether trained workflows keep getting used and at what cost, adding an operating signal the program can't get from attendance or a one-time skills assessment.
  • DatadogAI Champions & Center of Excellence Enablement uses Datadog when champions support a deployed workflow, so the program has a real alert and incident signal for where help is needed instead of relying on whoever complains loudest.

Training, serving and MLOps

  • Hugging FaceExecutive AI Literacy and Role-Based Workforce AI Training use Hugging Face's model and dataset cards as primary material for practicing a core judgment skill: checking what evidence a model's own documentation actually supports before relying on it.

Safety and security testing

  • Lakera GuardResponsible & Secure AI Training uses Lakera Guard to let participants see how a real runtime control reacts to unsafe or manipulated input, connecting the policy judgment taught in the room to an actual production enforcement layer.
  • MindgardResponsible & Secure AI Training uses Mindgard's attack scenarios to move past easy, obvious misuse examples and test whether participants can recognize a real adversarial pattern and follow the correct escalation path.
  • Guardrails AIResponsible & Secure AI Training uses Guardrails AI to show the difference between a policy statement and a control that runs: participants test inputs that should pass and fail, then inspect the decision rather than hearing only a rule.

Data, labeling and development

  • JupyterFive children use Jupyter because this page explicitly refuses to count attendance or access as proof of changed work: adoption, productivity, champions, prompting, and role-based training all need a baseline and measured result a second reviewer can rerun.
Share the workflow, operational bottleneck, or use case you want to automate. We will build an actionable AI implementation roadmap.
Brief us