Work on the information available to retrieval
SEO for Large Language Models

Some of the 500+ brands we've worked with
See all referencesInputs your team can examine
The useful work happens before the model makes its choice


GEO Strategy & AI Search Audit


Technical AI Search Optimization


AI Citation Content Optimization


Entity & Knowledge Graph Optimization


AI Search Authority & Citation Strategy


AI Visibility Monitoring & Answer Accuracy
Information available at retrieval time
LLM SEO works with retrieval-time information
When an LLM browses or retrieves web content, it receives whatever pages and sources that system can access at the time. LLM SEO improves the accessibility, quality, and consistency of those inputs.
The GEO path into the model layer
Access, extraction, identity, then corroboration
The path begins with crawler access, then moves through extracted passages, entity understanding, and corroborating sources. GEO can work on each of those conditions. Training choices, hidden retrieval rules, and final answer generation stay with the platform.
Scope and ownership
We work on the retrieval-time inputs; the model layer is not ours to move
The label is useful because it marks where your influence over web information ends.
We improve the accessibility, clarity, and consistency of the pages and sources an LLM can reach at retrieval time, working through crawler access, extracted passages, entity understanding, and corroborating evidence in that order. A live page being browsed or retrieved does not change a system's trained parameters, so the test follows the information path actually in use; a retrieved fragment keeps its subject, source relationships, and necessary qualifications so it stays true on its own. Training choices, hidden retrieval rules, and final answer generation remain with the third-party platform, and observed outputs cannot reveal — much less place under your control — every internal ranking decision.
Separate what you can observe from what you cannot control
Current retrieval does not rewrite training
A system may browse or retrieve a live page without changing its trained parameters. The test must follow the information path that is actually in use.
A fragment may carry the whole answer
Its subject and source relationships need to remain explicit. Necessary qualifications stay with the fragment as well.
Independent evidence adds corroboration
Consistent facts across owned and external sources give the system more evidence to assess than one self-published claim.
Hidden ranking decisions remain hidden
We can test outputs and exposed sources. Those observations cannot reveal every internal ranking or generation decision, much less place it under your control.
Clients on the work
What it is like to work with Zeo
Our clients describe the work in their own words.
Adjacent search evidence
Case Studies
Organic search engagements establishing the indexation, content depth, and domain authority that AI answer engines draw from.
People who watch how AI cites a brand
GEO work starts with recording what AI answers actually say about a brand today, then moves to the parts you can influence. The consultants below work on the specific capability this page covers.

Didem Himmetli
Marketing Executive

Can Mutioğlu
Senior SEO Executive

Gülşah Şahin Özkan
Senior SEO Analyst

Hande Parmaksız
SEO Manager

Ezgi Gülsen Yaylı
SEO Manager

Sena Önder
Senior SEO Executive

Ataberk Yüzat
SEO Executive

Sinem Bakır Yavaş
Senior SEO Executive

Aybüke Göktuna
Senior SEO Analyst

Ruhan Tiryaki
Senior SEO Analyst

Yağmur Bayram
Sr. SEO Analyst

Mehmet Aktuğ
Co-Founder & COO

Deniz İmre Temiztürk
Content Specialist
Tools we use
What we watch AI answers with
Generative search leaves less to read than a rankings report does, so most of this work is assembling evidence from tools that were never built for it.
AI answer and citation tracking
- AhrefsSince this page is explicit that hidden ranking decisions stay hidden, work here can only be judged by its downstream effect; Ahrefs Brand Radar's citation tracking is what gets checked afterward to see whether improved access and corroboration moved anything, rather than promising the mechanism itself.
Entity and structured data
- Screaming FrogThis page's own framing, that LLM SEO addresses information a model may encounter while browsing or retrieving sources at inference time, starts with a Screaming Frog crawl under the relevant bot's user-agent to establish page access, before content clarity or entity consistency is even assessed.
- DiffbotBecause this page's own point is that a retrieval-time fragment may carry the whole answer, Diffbot's fact-and-entity extraction is used to preview what a retrieval pipeline is likely to pull from a given page, showing whether the extracted fragment actually preserves the claim's qualifications or loses them outside full-page context.
- Schema AppThis page's fourth step, independent evidence adds corroboration, is a role Schema App's structured entity data plays directly: markup that states a fact in machine-readable form alongside the prose gives a retrieval system a second, independently checkable version of the same claim.
Follow the retrieval path
Mark the boundary between your inputs and the model


The limits around the model layer
































