A mention tells you that your brand appeared. It does not tell you whether the answer rests on credible sources. We inspect the pages and passages attached to priority answers, separate genuine evidence gaps from normal variation, and judge whether authority work has a case.
AI Search Authority & Citation Strategy service artwork

Some of the 500+ brands we've worked with

See all references
  • Acıbadem Sağlık Grubu
  • PWC Türkiye
  • Sabancı Üniversitesi
  • Desa
  • Kale
  • DLive

We compare priority answers with the exact pages they cite. The review may uncover weak owned evidence, stale coverage, or a missing independent source. It may also show ordinary answer variation. The evidence decides whether to improve a source you control, develop independent material, pursue earned media, or leave the issue alone.

We own the source-gap diagnosis and the authority brief. Your content team owns publishable evidence on the site. Digital PR handles publisher research, outreach, and media relationships. Measurement follows later citation and source behavior. Keeping those roles distinct prevents the brief from becoming a placement promise.

Keeping the roles distinct is what stops an authority brief from turning into a promise of coverage.

The approved question panel, answer, mode, locale, date, repetition, and exact cited pages stay in one record, and a reviewer marks each material statement as direct support, partial support, context only, contradiction, or uncertainty before anyone calls it a gap. Zeo names the specific missing evidence — owned material, independent research, expert commentary, profile consistency, or earned media — and hands each approved action to one owner: your content team publishes evidence on the site, Digital PR handles publisher research and outreach, and measurement follows later citation behaviour. Ordinary answer variation is reported as variation, and the decision to leave an issue alone is a legitimate outcome.

Each stage makes the source record harder to misread. Content production and publisher outreach wait until the evidence supports an action and the responsible team accepts it.
  1. Keep the answer with its conditions

    The approved question panel, answer, mode, locale, date, repetition, and exact cited pages remain one record.
  2. Read the passage against the claim

    A reviewer checks every material statement and marks the source as direct support, partial support, context only, contradiction, or uncertainty.
  3. Name the missing evidence

    The gap might concern owned material, independent research, expert commentary, profile consistency, or earned media. We record the specific need.
  4. Hand it to one team

    One owner accepts each approved action. Once something is published, we validate the evidence and report later citation behavior as a separate outcome.

Our clients describe the work in their own words.

Didem Namver
pepsico-logo.png

We were working with a global supplier on SEO before. Accessibility and process management were a little more difficult with these teams. At the same time, in terms of budget, global suppliers were more costly for us due to exchange rate differences and man-hours. When we started working with Zeo, we first went through an audit, fixing the results and problems. After these processes, we placed SEO in a strategic place for digital marketing and created an always-on SEO strategy for our brands and implemented it step by step.

Didem Namver, Sr. Head of Digital

Yiğit Ertem
media-markt.png

As MediaMarkt, we have been working with Zeo for 6 years in a very tight and coordinated way to manage our SEO processes. We receive the highest level of feedback from Zeo on increasing and improving our organic traffic. It is very enjoyable to get fast support on all our issues 24/7 and to work with Zeo to better embrace and continuously improve our brand, and we recommend it to everyone.

Yiğit Ertem, Ecommerce Web Channel & PIM Department Manager

Emre Baykal
acibadem-logo.png

We strictly follow the regulations and algorithms that can change at any time; We need to act quickly. At this point, Zeo has become a partner that meets all our expectations with its professional, innovative and solution-oriented approach. The Zeo team has become a stakeholder in success by looking at our optimization processes and our brand as their own value. As the Acıbadem Healthcare Group family, we would like to thank all the Zeo team, who work tirelessly, constantly improve, and do not compromise on keeping their energy high under all circumstances!

Emre Baykal, Director of Digital Marketing

Kaan Deniz
Jack Martin

Besides increasing our website's visibility in the UK with Zeo, the experienced team that closely follows its work and has extensive experience in its field has always made us feel like we are in the right place for SEO. We are on the right track with Zeo in a country and industry where competition is high.

Kaan Deniz, Founder

Zeynep Yaşar
Armağan

We talked to a number of agencies while we were planning our website's infrastructure migration, and we ended up with Zeo. They start by understanding the problem, then bring fresh approaches to solving it better. Communication is strong, and they support you at whatever point you turn out to need it. Every minute we spend working with them convinces us further that we made the right call. If you're looking for someone to sort out the digital side, you're in the right place.

Zeynep Yaşar, Business Development Specialist & E-commerce Project Manager

Organic search engagements establishing the indexation, content depth, and domain authority that AI answer engines draw from.

Generative search leaves less to read than a rankings report does, so most of this work is assembling evidence from tools that were never built for it.

AI answer and citation tracking

  • ProfoundThis page's own first step, keep the answer with its conditions, needs the citing sources attached to the answer, not inferred afterward; Profound's citation-source capture is what supplies that record before the passage-versus-claim read happens.
  • AhrefsOnce a citing source is identified, Ahrefs' Brand Radar and its underlying domain data let the review weigh that source's own authority signals, which feeds directly into whether a genuine evidence gap exists or the pattern is normal variation.

Content evidence and sourcing

  • Muck RackThis sub-service covers both diagnosing a citation gap and the earned-media response to it; Muck Rack is what a specialist checks while still in the diagnosis stage, reading whether an outlet the audit flagged as under-represented actually has an active reporter on the beat right now, before the case for authority work is even made.
  • MajesticThis page separates a genuine evidence gap from normal variation partly by checking whether the missing or weak source is actually low-authority by an independent measure; Majestic's Trust Flow is that independent check, run before the case for authority work gets made.
Bring the answers and source patterns that have raised questions for your team. We will inspect what supports them, then decide whether the next step sits with owned content, Digital PR, or nowhere.
Review your source gaps