Content Marketing
Content Strategy

Some of the 500+ brands we've worked with
See all referencesWhat we plan
Make the production decisions before the calendar fills up
Content Strategy & Research


Content Audits
Aimed backwards at URLs you already own. Each one leaves with a keep, fix, merge, or cut decision, and a strategist opens every page before a deletion is signed.


Audience & Demand Research
Answers who, before anything answers what. Interviews, CRM records, and support tickets are reconciled into claims that each name a source, with the remaining guesses left labelled as guesses.


Competitor Content Analysis
Looks outward at published pages only, never at a rival's private roadmap. Every thin spot it finds ships labelled a hypothesis to test rather than a proven opportunity.


Keyword & Topic Research
Turns a raw query export into clusters that carry an intent, a business-fit score, and a verdict of new page, refresh, or leave alone, checked against what you already rank for.


SEO Content Briefs
One validated topic becomes a spec with acceptance criteria. It is finished only when the writer, editor, and subject expert each agree nothing is left for the draft to decide.


Topic Cluster Strategy & Content Architecture
Draws the page boundaries and the link contract for a subject too big for one page, then orders the build by dependency. No page survives that only completes the diagram.


Editorial Calendar Planning
Assumes the priorities are settled and asks a colder question — what will actually ship. Writer, expert, and reviewer bandwidth set the dates, then delivered dates are compared against planned ones.


Expert Interview & Knowledge Capture
For knowledge that exists only inside one person's head. The recording becomes a claim map that the expert approves line by line, with reuse permissions attached to each excerpt.


Original Research Planning
The number has to be yours and defensible. The analysis is written down before any data arrives, and ethics clears the consent language before a participant is contacted.
Content Optimization & Operations


SEO Content Optimization
A live page is stuck and you have enough ranking history to name why. The rewrite is confined to the one diagnosed cause, and sibling pages are checked for new overlap.


Content Refreshes
The page used to work and has since decayed. Its before-state is frozen, only the stale facts move, and the URL is deliberately kept so the old rankings and links survive.


Copy Editing & Content QA
An independent gate, not a writing service. Someone who did not write the draft reads it against the brief and either approves it or names exactly what must change.


Content Governance
Decision rights come first here — who may approve what, which risks need a second signature, and where the exception path runs. It needs a real signer willing to own it.


Editorial Workflow Design
Answers how work moves rather than who signs it. Real pieces are traced through your tools to find where drafts stall, then the design is run against a hard case.


Content Performance Reviews
Reads the whole portfolio, not one page, and fixes the metric definitions before the data is pulled. Every call leaves with a named owner and a date to check it.


Content Pruning & Consolidation
For the irreversible half of the cleanup. The baseline is frozen, redirects run one hop, a rollback waits ready, and nobody signs off their own deletion.


Internal Linking Strategy & Implementation
Between pages that already deserve to exist. Each anchor has to describe its destination inside a real sentence, and the destination's owner confirms that page is ready for the traffic.


Content Localization
A second market, not a second language. Claims that are only true at home get flagged rather than carried, and a native reviewer decides whether the page reads as written.
Why it matters
A publishing calendar needs a reason behind it
When weekly urgency sets the agenda, teams can spend heavily on pieces with no clear audience or business job. A content strategy connects each asset to audience needs, business priorities, and search intent, then gives the team a basis for deciding what to update, create, or stop.
How we work
See the current state before planning the next quarter
We audit what is already there, speak with stakeholders and customers, and identify who else competes for the audience's attention. The roadmap then sets priorities, topic clusters, calendars, owners, and success measures your team can use.
Scope and ownership
Priorities, owners, and a review cadence before the calendar fills
The roadmap says what to update, create, or stop, and names who owns each initiative.
We inventory the existing content, review rankings and performance, and compare the useful gaps against competitors, then map buyer needs and search intent onto topic clusters. Zeo orders initiatives by business impact and effort and assigns briefs, owners, and deadlines in a rolling calendar. The voice, quality, SEO, and approval standards stay yours to sign off, and we agree the cadence for reviewing results and market changes.
How the strategy becomes a working plan
Find what deserves attention
We inventory the content, review rankings and performance, and compare the useful gaps against competitors. That separates near-term work from longer-term opportunities.
Connect audiences, searches, and topics
Buyer needs and search intent are mapped to topic clusters, giving each planned piece a defined audience and a measurable SEO target.
Put priorities into a calendar the team can run
Initiatives are ordered by business impact and effort, then assigned briefs, owners, and deadlines in a rolling calendar.
Decide how the program will be reviewed
We agree the voice, quality, SEO, and approval standards, along with a review cadence for changes in results and market conditions.
Our Clients'
Thoughts about Zeo
Their accounts of the work are more useful than another claim from us.
Strategy work
Case Studies
Publishing plans built from search demand, then held to over several quarters.
People who write and ship this content
Some of these consultants write the pages themselves. Others plan distribution or check how a piece performs once it's live, so the team below covers more than one stage of the work.

Yiğit Konur
Founder & Chief Strategy Officer

Sinem Bakır Yavaş
Senior SEO Executive

Metehan Urhan
New Business & Partnership Manager

Hande Parmaksız
SEO Manager

Sena Önder
Senior SEO Executive

Elif Naz Akan Karakoç
Senior SEO Executive

Ali Özgün Öz
SEO Executive

Ruhan Tiryaki
Senior SEO Analyst

Yağmur Bayram
Sr. SEO Analyst

Bensu Tınastepe
Senior SEO Analyst

Gülşah Şahin Özkan
Senior SEO Analyst

Emir Kağan Kahveci
SEO Analyst

Ozan Ketenci
VP of Consulting & Strategy
Tools we use
The content stack behind the work
Research, briefing, editing and outreach each need their own tool. These are the ones our writers and editors work in.
Research and demand intelligence
- SemrushWe size search demand across candidate topics in Semrush during the step this service calls connecting audiences, searches, and topics, since a topic priority list built without real demand data is really just an opinion. That sizing is what separates a topic worth its own cluster from one that belongs as a subsection of something bigger.
- AhrefsDuring the find-what-deserves-attention step, we inventory the existing content set in Ahrefs Content Explorer to see what is already published and how it performs. A strategy that skips this step risks recommending a topic the site has already covered, just under a different title.
- Google TrendsWe check Google Trends for each candidate topic before it earns a place in the calendar, since a strategy built on a spike rather than a genuine rise wastes production budget on something that will look dated in a month. That check happens at the priority-setting stage, before the calendar itself is built.
- SimilarwebWhen a strategy considers matching a competitor's content investment, we check their channel mix in Similarweb first, since a competitor's visible content success sometimes rests mostly on paid or direct traffic rather than organic search. That distinction changes whether matching their approach is actually the right recommendation.
- BuzzSumoAlongside the search-volume data from Semrush and Ahrefs, we check BuzzSumo for which formats and angles already earn engagement in the category, since a topic with real search demand can still underperform in the wrong format. That second signal is what shapes the calendar's format choices, not just its topic list.
- AnswerThePublicRather than researching one topic in isolation, we run every candidate subject on the shortlist through AnswerThePublic during the connect-audiences-searches-and-topics step, then compare the size and richness of each one's question map side by side. A subject that returns a thin, shallow set of questions is a weaker claim on next quarter's calendar space than one with real depth to draw from, regardless of how the two compare on search volume alone.
- AlsoAskedOnce a topic clears the priority bar, we pull its AlsoAsked tree to make the calendar-space decision itself: a shallow tree with only one or two real follow-ups gets a single planned article, while a tree with several distinct follow-up branches earns a full topic cluster with its own publishing schedule. That sizing decision, one page or several, is what this tool actually settles at the strategy level, before any individual brief gets written.
- SparkToroWe check SparkToro for where a target audience already spends attention online, since a strategy built purely on search demand can miss the channels and communities where that same audience is easiest to actually reach. That view rounds out the audience side of the audience-search-topic connection this service builds.
Content optimization and briefs
- MarketMuseWe run the existing content set through MarketMuse's topic modeling to see whether a priority topic already has partial coverage that just needs deepening, or whether it needs to be built from nothing. That distinction is what keeps the calendar from recommending a brand-new article where an update would do the job faster.
Editorial planning and design
- NotionWe document the decide-how-the-program-will-be-reviewed step directly in Notion, since a governance model that only exists in a kickoff deck gets forgotten by the next quarterly review. That reference stays open and editable, which is what keeps the review cadence this service promises actually happening instead of lapsing after the first quarter.
- AirtableWe put priorities into the actual publishing calendar in Airtable, the step this service names directly as turning priorities into a calendar the team can run. Because it is a filterable database rather than a static document, a slipping deadline shows up immediately instead of getting buried until someone checks manually.
Publishing, distribution and measurement
- Google AnalyticsBefore recommending what the next quarter should prioritize, we review existing content's engagement and conversion performance in GA4, the current-state check this service names directly in its own second section. A plan that skips this step is planning against an assumption instead of what is actually working today.
- Google Search ConsoleWe pull the real queries and pages the site already earns visibility for in Search Console before proposing new topic priorities, since a strategy that ignores existing rankings risks recommending a topic the site is already halfway to owning. That check anchors the connect-audiences-searches-and-topics step in verified data.
Next step
Build a content strategy that earns traffic


FAQ

























