Update what is stale and preserve what still works.

Content Refreshes update a page that once performed well but has become outdated, while preserving the sections that still earn rankings, links, and reader value.

You walk away with the stale parts of a retained page updated, the sections that still earn their place untouched, and a date to check whether the refresh worked.

Refresh a page

Some of the 500+ brands we've worked with

See all references

We diagnose the decline, update only what is stale, secure expert approval, and set the next review.

Diagnose why it slipped, and freeze the before-state
We check whether the cause is outdated facts, a shifted search intent, new competition, a technical issue, or the product itself moving on, and record the current rankings, links, and conversions so we know exactly what changed.
A specific diagnosis naming the cause of decay, plus a before-state record to check against later.
AI assist
Agents can compare the page's claims against newer sources, list coverage competitors have added, and find internal links that have since broken. Why the page slipped is diagnosed by a strategist reading its own history.
Human gate
The SEO lead confirms the diagnosed cause before any rewriting starts.
Update only what's stale
We revise the outdated facts and structure, and leave sections that still serve the reader well, since a page doesn't need a full rewrite to earn a second life.
An annotated before-after draft with a reason attached to every change.
AI assist
Agents can mark which passages depend on a date, a figure, or a product detail that has since changed. Which of those still deserve to stay is decided by the editor, because a refresh can easily overwrite what was working.
Human gate
The editor decides which sections get touched and which stay as-is.
Get the right people to sign off
The subject expert, SEO lead, and editor each confirm the parts they own, so an updated fact or a repositioned claim doesn't ship on assumption alone.
An approved refresh with resolved comments and a clear release call.
AI assist
Newer sources help an agent flag facts that may have aged. A subject expert checks whether the product or topic has truly changed.
Human gate
The subject expert confirms every updated fact by hand. An agent's flag is only a starting point.
Ship and set the next check
The update goes live, we note what we'd expect to see if it worked, and we set a date to check whether the decay is resolved.
A live update, a QA record, and a next-review trigger.
AI assist
Agents can re-pull the baseline measures on the review date and show them next to the before-state. Whether the refresh worked, or whether the page is now past refreshing, is a human read.
Human gate
The content owner sets the next-review date and what would count as the refresh working.

A flag is a starting point. Your expert confirms the fact.

An old page leaves useful clues. Agents can compare its claims with newer sources, spot coverage that competitors have added, and catch broken internal links from earlier campaigns. That saves time on the first pass. Product truth and the reason for a ranking decline still need context the model does not have. A subject expert confirms each updated fact, while the editor decides which original sections have earned the right to stay.

You receive the updated page together with a before-and-after record explaining every material change.

Diagnosis and before-state record
What caused the decay, plus a snapshot of the page before anything changed.
Annotated refresh
The updated page with a reason next to every material change, so reviewers can see exactly what moved.
QA record and next-review trigger
Confirmation the update is accurate and live, plus what would tell us it's time to look again.

We call it done when: the content owner and subject expert have confirmed the update, retained value is intact, and there's a date to check whether it worked.

This method updates a page with existing value rather than replacing it with a blank-page rewrite.

A good fit when

A page that once earned rankings, traffic, or reader value has clearly slipped, but nobody has separated decay from a technical or intent problem.
Facts, competition, or the product have changed since publication, so the page now carries claims a subject expert needs to recheck.
The URL still has sections worth protecting, while the stale material needs an annotated update rather than a blank-page rewrite.

Better handled as other work when

The page never earned rankings or links, so its diagnosis belongs with optimization or a full rewrite.
The only requested change is a fresher publication date, while the facts, structure, and product claims would remain untouched.
No subject expert can confirm which facts are still true, so an annotated refresh would replace uncertainty with unsupported copy.

Some of these consultants write the pages themselves. Others plan distribution or check how a piece performs once it's live, so the team below covers more than one stage of the work.

Content we've produced on this topic

Articleby Can MutioğluFive Steps for Optimizing Thin Content Videoby Ozan KetenciArama Eğilimlerine Göre İçerik Optimizasyonu - Ozan Ketenci Videoby Ozan KetenciOzan Ketenci - Arama Eğilimi Odaklı Optimizasyon İpuçları Articleby Samet ÖzsüleymanGoogle Helpful Content Update: Need to Know & Actions

Ahrefs
flags the slow-decay pattern before it shows up as a single bad month
MarketMuse
shows what a page's competing set now covers that it did not at first publish
Google Search Console
separates a lost ranking from a page that ranks fine but stopped earning clicks
Google Analytics
the before-state a refresh gets measured against at the next check