An inventory of what should be indexed, evidence for what is actually happening, and cohort decisions that each carry a name and a reason.

Search engines don't see everything you publish, and they don't index everything they see. When robots rules, sitemaps, canonicals, and redirects drift out of sync, valuable pages quietly fall out of the index while junk URLs keep eating your crawl budget.

The pages worth finding get found. The rest stop competing for attention.

A Zeo crawler figure sorts glowing URL tiles into keep, redirect, and retire piles beside a sitemap console.

Some of the 500+ brands we've worked with

See all references
  • Hepsiburada
  • Yves Rocher
  • ETS Tur
  • Tosla
  • Desa
  • Koleksiyon Mobilya
  • Elele

Four stages, each one grounded in log data and Search Console evidence.

  1. Get the real data

    We pull your URL inventory, server logs, and Search Console coverage. This shows what bots and search engines are actually doing instead of a crawler's best guess at what's live.

    A dated, scoped dataset everyone agrees is the starting point.

    AI assist
    AI reconciles the CMS URL export, the routing layer, and the raw server-log sample into one matched dataset, and flags where the three disagree before anyone starts diagnosing.
    Human gate
    Our technical lead confirms the log window and URL scope are genuinely representative before the dataset becomes the agreed baseline. Dataset dated and scope-agreed before reconciliation starts.
  2. Compare crawled against indexed

    We line up bot requests against index coverage, sitemap membership, and canonical signals for the same URLs, so we can see exactly where discovery and indexing disagree.

    A clear map of which URLs are eligible, which are excluded, and which are stuck in between.

    AI assist
    AI joins bot-request logs, sitemap membership, canonical signals, and Search Console coverage per URL, and surfaces every case where the four sources disagree.
    Human gate
    Each disagreement gets read in its own context, and our technical lead decides whether it is a real problem or a deliberate exclusion. Disagreement map reviewed cohort by cohort.
  3. Decide, cohort by cohort

    For each group of URLs we choose allow, consolidate, redirect, noindex, or retire, and write down why, so the next person doesn't have to guess.

    A change list where every item traces back to evidence instead of a hunch.

    AI assist
    AI groups URLs by shared template, parameter pattern, or mismatch signature, so one decision covers a whole cohort instead of a single URL.
    Human gate
    The allow, redirect, consolidate, or noindex call for each cohort is made by our technical lead, who signs their name to the reason. Every cohort decision carries a named owner and reason.
  4. Ship it small, then watch

    We roll out the smallest version of the change, recrawl, and check whether the index actually responded the way we expected.

    Either the pattern holds and we expand it, or it doesn't and we find out why before it spreads.

    AI assist
    AI recrawls the pilot cohort and diffs the resulting coverage state against the prediction, batch-flagging any URL that didn't move as expected.
    Human gate
    Whether the pilot is strong enough to expand, or needs another round first, is our technical lead's decision. Sitewide expansion approved only after the pilot holds.

AI reconciles the datasets; a named technical lead decides what each cohort deserves.

AI reconciles the CMS URL export, the routing layer, and the raw server-log sample into one matched dataset, joins bot-request logs, sitemap membership, canonical signals, and Search Console coverage per URL, groups URLs by shared template, parameter pattern, or mismatch signature, and diffs the recrawled pilot cohort against the prediction. The cohort call stays human. We will not force every URL into the index to inflate a coverage number, we do not ship a bulk robots, canonical, or redirect change without sampling who it actually touches first, and we never build directives that show search engines something different from what your visitors see.

Four things you can hold in your hand.

  • Brief

    Crawl & index baseline

    Accepted when

    States exactly which URL cohorts we looked at, who owns the call, and what's explicitly out of scope.

  • Decision matrix

    URL-state evidence

    Accepted when

    Every URL's crawl and index status is backed by a log line or a Search Console record.

  • Redirect map

    Robots, sitemap & redirect changes

    Accepted when

    Every rule change has a reason, an owner, and a way to reverse it if it doesn't work.

  • Audit report

    Post-launch validation

    Accepted when

    Says plainly whether the index moved the way we expected, and what happens next.

We call it done when: The baseline, URL-state evidence, directive changes, and post-launch validation are done when the baseline names the cohorts, the owner, and what is out of scope, every URL's crawl and index status is backed by a log line or a Search Console record, every rule change carries a reason, an owner, and a way to reverse it, and the validation says plainly whether the index moved as expected and what happens next.

Getting crawled isn't the same as getting indexed, and getting indexed isn't the same as getting found for the right thing.

A good fit when

  • You're not sure how much of your site search engines actually keep in the index, versus just visit once and move on.
  • Your crawl budget is going to parameters, duplicates, or pages nobody should be looking at in the first place.
  • You need robots, sitemap, and canonical rules that someone actually owns and can explain.

Better handled as other work when

  • You want every URL forced into the index regardless of whether it deserves to be there.
  • You want to ship a bulk redirect or noindex change today without checking who and what it touches first.

If one of these is closer to your situation, start here instead: Technical SEO

We call it done when: You finish with an inventory of what should be indexed, evidence of what is actually happening, and a monitoring habit that catches drift before it costs you traffic.

  • Screaming Frog

    directive crawl for canonicals, robots, sitemaps, and redirects

  • JetOctopus

    bot-request evidence by directory, pattern, and response code

  • Oncrawl

    joined crawl, log, analytics, and Search Console states

  • Sitebulb

    visual crawl maps for traps, depth, and isolated cohorts

  • Google Search Console

    index coverage, sitemap status, and sampled URL decisions

  • Bing Webmaster Tools

    second-engine index checks and controlled URL submission evidence

  • Yoast SEO

    index directives and sitemap membership traced to their WordPress source

Bring your Search Console access and whatever server logs you've got. We'll help you see the gap between what's crawled and what's indexed.
Look inside your index

Agents compare thousands of URLs against their expected crawl and index state and flag the mismatches. This covers the comparison work that takes hours by hand. Deciding what a mismatch means, and whether to change a directive, stays with a Zeo specialist.